2003 Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in children and adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic conditions of childhood. Type 1 diabetes accounts for most of the cases, affecting one in 300 children and adolescents; however, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing, especially among overweight and obese children and adolescents, and those in high-risk ethnic groups. Recent advances in diabetes management led to the development of the 2003 Canadian Diabetes Association clinical practice guidelines which address clinically important questions related to the prevention, detection and management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes and their complications. These guidelines are evidenced-based and were developed following a systematic collection and appraisal of the available evidence with recommendations graded according to the level and applicability of the evidence. In the present issue, the guidelines that are specific and/or relevant to children and adolescents with diabetes are presented. Supporting evidence is discussed and recommendations presented for the management of children and adolescents with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".