MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181534900 · doi:10.18260/1-2--11774

Bringing Engineering To K 12 Classrooms Initiatives And Results

2020· article· en· W2181534900 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEngineering managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1989, the Women in Engineering Committee at Ryerson University has been developing strategies to increase the participation rate of young women in engineering at Ryerson. The Discover Engineering Summer Camp was launched in 1991, as a day camp targeting female students in grades 10 to 12. The aim of the camp was to introduce engineering concepts to young women through hands-on and creative activities. In 1999, the committee launched the Discover Engineering High School Workshop program with a goal to raise awareness about careers in engineering among all high school students. The High School Workshop program brings Discover Engineering directly to the classroom, and is offered in a co-ed classroom environment -not just to female students. This new initiative has allowed us to disseminate our information to a wider audience and to survey the high school students about their knowledge of and interest in engineering before and after participating in our programs. We also were able to study how role models within the family influenced their choices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207