The miraculous birth, roller-coaster life and all too rapid death of the platelet was on full display at the recent Platelet Workshop held at the Melbourne Exhibition and Convention Centre over the weekend of 27-28 October 2012.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
™The simultaneity with the HAA/APSTH meetings ensured notable international platelet experts including Yukio Ozaki (Japan), Satoshi Nishimura (Japan), Bernhard Nieswandt (Germany), Peter Gross (Canada), and Paul Harrison (UK), together with over 20 local speakers convened over two days for this special workshop. On the programme were six oral sessions, with three major symposia in each session and free communications featuring the highest-ranked abstracts. There was a stand-alone poster session, and plentiful social and networking opportunities, all in the heart of Melbourne’s docklands entertainment precinct. Workshop sessions were broadly arranged to cover megakaryopoiesis and platelet production, platelet function ex vivo and in vivo, and platelet death and clearance. These presentations featured state-ofthe-art imaging, new experimental models of thrombosis or inflammation, biochemical analysis of platelet receptors and activation pathways, and the clinical importance of platelet function in human disease. Haematological systems involving platelets far exceed haemostasis and thrombosis, and platelets are increasingly studied in the context of inflammation, infectious diseases, metabolic diseases and cancer, a point brought home throughout the workshop. Research presented also highlighted how past and current investigations in basic science and molecular mechanisms can be translated to improve understanding, diagnosis or therapeutic approaches in clinical disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".