Effects of age, gender, and blood pressure on myogenic responses of mesenteric arteries from C57BL/6 mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The myogenic response (MR) may represent an important physiological parameter underlying arterial blood pressure (BP). We studied the effects of age, gender, and BP on the MR of mesenteric arteries from 8- to 52-wk-old mice. Increasing age and BP are associated with an increase in the perfusion pressure at which tone develops (myogenic set point). An inverse correlation exists between age and extent (magnitude) of the MR in male (r(2) = 0.93, P = 0.0087) and female mice (r(2) = 0.90, P = 0.013) as well as between BP and extent of the MR in male (r(2) = 0.96, P = 0.0036) and female (r(2) = 0.90, P = 0.014) mice. In contrast, the strength of the MR (slope of active diameter-pressure relationship) and phenylephrine-mediated constriction did not differ among these groups. Although gender had no effect on MR at any perfusion pressure or age, only male mice showed significant salt-induced hypertension and an associated increase in the set point and reduction in the extent of the MR. The set point and extent of the MR is linked to the in vivo pressure during development and experimental hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".