MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181709664 · doi:10.7186/bgsm47200308

A dextral strike-slip model for the Miri Structure

2003· article· en· W2181709664 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mustaffa Kamal Shuib

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSinistral and dextralStrike-slip tectonicsGeologySeismologyGeometryFault (geology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Miri Structure shows complex geometry as a result of interplay between compression and tensional wrenching. Evidences for strike slip deformation are illustrated. These include the presence of: 1. En-echelon normal fault arrangements along a major fault with dominant normal throw (Shell Hill Fault), often accompanied by reverse fault throws and dip reversals along individual faults showing the following features: • Conjugate fault systems (synthetic and antithetic) • Small-scale faults showing negative and positive flower structures • Oblique and down-dip striations • Ribbon effect geometry 2. A dextral strike slip fault zone named the Canada Hill 'Thrust' Zone, characterized by: • Sub-horizontal striations • Fault zone associated with both compressional and extensional structure • Thrusts and extensional faults showing cross-cutting relationships in a single section 3. Presence of push-up block/ridge bounded by the Shell Hill Fault and Canada Hill Thrust zone. 4. Curved horse-tail configuration. The main conclusions from this study are as follows: 1. The 4 sets of structural elements associated with the Miri Structure are coeval. 2. They are the result of a progressive NNE-trending dextral strike-slip deformational event. Dextral strike-slip movement could have initiated early prior to lithification and continued after lithification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Geological Society of MalaysiaSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207