Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Miri Structure shows complex geometry as a result of interplay between compression and tensional wrenching. Evidences for strike slip deformation are illustrated. These include the presence of: 1. En-echelon normal fault arrangements along a major fault with dominant normal throw (Shell Hill Fault), often accompanied by reverse fault throws and dip reversals along individual faults showing the following features: • Conjugate fault systems (synthetic and antithetic) • Small-scale faults showing negative and positive flower structures • Oblique and down-dip striations • Ribbon effect geometry 2. A dextral strike slip fault zone named the Canada Hill 'Thrust' Zone, characterized by: • Sub-horizontal striations • Fault zone associated with both compressional and extensional structure • Thrusts and extensional faults showing cross-cutting relationships in a single section 3. Presence of push-up block/ridge bounded by the Shell Hill Fault and Canada Hill Thrust zone. 4. Curved horse-tail configuration. The main conclusions from this study are as follows: 1. The 4 sets of structural elements associated with the Miri Structure are coeval. 2. They are the result of a progressive NNE-trending dextral strike-slip deformational event. Dextral strike-slip movement could have initiated early prior to lithification and continued after lithification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".