An interaction between statins and clopidogrel : a pharmacoepidemiology cohort study with survival time analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug prescribed to prevent stent thrombosis after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous evidence suggests that some widely prescribed statins may inhibit the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel via competitive metabolism of its activating enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). The objective was to investigate the possibility of an interaction post-PCI between statins and clopidogrel. We carried out a population-based cohort study identifying 10,491 patients using clopidogrel post-PCI (2001-2004). The outcome was a composite of death of any cause, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, repeat revascularization, and cerebrovascular events. We found that co-prescription of CYP3A4-metabolized statins (hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.15), or non-CYP3A4-metabolized statins (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.07) with clopidogrel was not associated with increase in adverse outcomes. We observed no evidence of interaction between clopidogrel and statins in a large population cohort of PCI patients, suggesting unlikelihood of an important interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".