Work‐Related Asthma in Montreal, Quebec: Population Attributable Risk in a Community‐Based Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Occupational exposures are an important cause of adult-onset asthma but the population attributable risk percentage (PAR%) has been less frequently studied. OBJECTIVES: To examine the distribution and determinants of adult asthma in six centres across Canada using data gathered in a community-based study. METHODS: Data were gathered in a community survey of 2959 adults using the European Community Respiratory Health Survey Protocol. A subsample of 498 subjects completed detailed health and occupational questionnaires, methacholine challenge tests and allergy skin tests. Asthma was defined in three ways: current wheeze, asthma symptoms and/or medication, and airway hyperresponsiveness. Occupational exposures were classified as sensitizers or irritants. Associations between asthma and occupational exposures were examined using logistic regression analysis. Model selection was based on the findings for current wheeze, and the same model was applied to the other definitions of asthma. RESULTS: Fifty-six per cent of subjects reported ever having had occupational exposure to sensitizers, and 9.8% to irritants. Current wheeze was associated with exposure to irritants (PAR% 4.54%), and airway hyperresponsiveness was associated with exposure to sensitizers (PAR% 30.7%). Neither a history of childhood asthma, atopy, nor confining the analysis to adult-onset asthma affected these associations. Analysis of effect modification suggested two types of work-related asthma: one due to exposure to occupational sensitizers, and the other due to exposure to irritants. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed assessment of past and current exposures is essential in the investigation of work-related asthma. Childhood asthma reactivated or aggravated by work exposures is not easy to distinguish from asthma induced by work, a misclassification that could lead to an underestimation of work-induced asthma. This should be taken into account in jurisdictions in which persons with work-aggravated asthma are not eligible for workers' compensation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".