MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181808973 · doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2015.11.001

Planck 2015 results and inflation

2015· article· fr· W2181808973 on OpenAlexfundno aff
F. R. Bouchet

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Physique · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtConsiglio Nazionale delle RicercheMax-Planck-GesellschaftEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilTekesPartnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBLNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCanadian Space AgencyScience Foundation IrelandCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPlanckCosmic microwave backgroundPhysicsInflation (cosmology)HumanitiesAstrophysicsAnisotropyTheoretical physicsPhilosophyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Planck mission prime objective was a very accurate and complete measurement of the temperature anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Cosmological results from the intensity data of the nominal mission of a duration of 15 months were disclosed on 21 March 2013. Fortunately, the satellite kept acquiring data for at least twice longer, and we announced in February 2015 new results based on all the data acquired, both in temperature and polarization. I provide a short overview of the latest data and findings of most interest for inflation, as a basis for the other contributions to this volume. This overview is entirely based on the published or submitted works of the Planck collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComptes Rendus PhysiqueSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207