Suppression of frequent ventricular ectopy in a patient with hypertrophic heart disease with ranolazine: a case report.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pro-arrhythmic concerns with most anti-arrhythmic agents in patients with significant left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) limits options when anti-arrhythmic therapy is indicated. Ranolazine, an anti-anginal agent which inhibits late Na+ currents, indirectly causes a decrease in diastolic cardiomyocyte Ca++ levels producing an energy sparing effect. Ranolazine also inhibits triggered activity in animal studies and has anti-arrhythmic properties in patients with ischemic heart disease. Here we report the dramatic anti-arrhythmic effects of ranolazine in a patient with frequent ventricular and supraventricular ectopy in the setting of hypertrophic heart disease without significant coronary artery disease. METHODS: A 72 year old hypertensive patient with palpitations and significant exercise intolerance due to dyspnea was evaluated with echocardiography, thallium stress testing and cardiac catheterization. Holter monitor data prior to, and after institution of ranolazine 1000 mg twice daily was compared. Patient tolerance and sense of well being after ranolazine was assessed. RESULTS: Significant LVH was noted and obstructive coronary artery disease was ruled out by cardiac catheterization. Within two hours of the initial dose of ranolazine a marked decrease in ventricular ectopy was observed. Ventricular ectopy on Holter monitor decreased approximately 12 fold (23.8% of beats to1.9%) while supraventricular ectopy decreased approximately 7 fold (5.3% of beats to 0.8%). The decrease in ectopy was associated with an improved sense of well being. CONCLUSION: Ranolazine had rapid onset, potent anti-arrhythmic properties in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease in a patient with LVH and may be an ideal agent in patients where few anti-arrhythmic options exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".