12 INITIAL GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE TREATMENT INCREASED PREGNANCY PER TIMED INSEMINATION ONLY IN ACYCLIC BEEF HEIFERS SUBJECTED TO A 5-DAY CO-SYNCH PROTOCOL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have shown that inclusion of initial gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in a 5-day Co-synch protocol is unnecessary to achieve acceptable pregnancy rates in dairy heifers (2011 Theriogenology 76, 578). This study determined the efficacy of a modified (without initial GnRH) 5-day Co-synch protocol for timed AI (TAI) and the effect of interval from progesterone device removal to TAI on pregnancy per TAI (P/TAI) in acyclic and cyclic beef heifers. Heifers (n = 1062; 302 to 515 kg of body weight, and 13 to 15 months of age) at 2 locations were assigned to either a 5-day Co-synch protocol with (control) or without (modified) an initial injection of 100 µg of GnRH (Fertagyl; Merck Animal Health, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) at progesterone device (CIDR; Zoetis Animal Health, Florham Park, NJ) insertion (Day 0). All heifers received a single dose of 500 µg of cloprostenol (Estrumate; Merck Animal Health) at CIDR removal (Day 5) and were divided into 2 groups to receive GnRH and simultaneously TAI at either 66 or 72 h (Day 8) after CIDR removal. All heifers were inseminated by one technician with frozen-thawed semen from 1 of 4 commercially available sires. Ovarian ultrasonography was performed on Day 0 to determine cyclicity (presence of corpus luteum) and normalcy of the reproductive track, and on Day 35 (27 days after TAI) to determine pregnancy status. Data were analysed using the PROC GLIMMIX in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The CIDR retention rate was 98%; P/TAI in heifers that lost the CIDR was 39%. Pregnancy per TAI [least squares means (n)] did not differ (P > 0.05) among sires [48 (235), 51 (318), 52 (274), and 53% (235)], location [57 (330) v. 53% (732)], timing of TAI [52 (533) v. 50% (529) for 66 and 72 h], or treatment groups [48 (525) v. 53% (537) for control and modified groups]. A total of 226 (21%) heifers were acyclic; P/TAI was lower in acyclic heifers compared with that in those cyclic (P < 0.01; 43 v. 59%). Administration of GnRH at CIDR insertion increased P/TAI in acyclic heifers (P < 0.01; 50 v. 35% for control and modified groups) but did not affect P/TAI in those that were cyclic at initiation of protocol (P > 0.05; 57 v. 62% for control and modified groups). In conclusion, timing of TAI did not affect fertility. However, administration of initial GnRH increased P/TAI by 15 percentiles in acyclic females, but as previously shown in Holstein heifers, initial GnRH was unnecessary to achieve acceptable P/TAI in cyclic beef heifers subjected to a 5-days Co-synch protocol. This study was supported by Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Intervet Canada Corp., and collaborative beef producers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".