Towards a Regional Strategy for the Management of the Transboundary Aquifer Systems in the Americas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Internationally Shared Aquifer Resource Management (ISARM)-Americas initiative has been successful in promoting cooperation in the sharing of data and information on transboundary aquifer systems (TAS) amid 24 countries from Argentina to Canada. Over a period of seven years (2003-2009), the ISARM-Americas initiative, jointly sponsored and coordinated by United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the Organization of American States (OAS), succeeded in inventorying 73 TAS in the American hemisphere. The initiative has produced two books; one containing the inventory of the 73 TAS in 2007, and a second one describing the legal and institutional aspects of the 73 TAS, in 2008. A third book is in preparation with a synthesis of the socio-economic, environmental and climatic aspects of the 73 TAS. The ISARM-Americas group is now preparing a regional strategy for the management of the transboundary aquifer systems in the American hemisphere. The regional strategy will be published as a fourth book in 2010 with a synthesis of the socio-economic, environmental and climatic aspects of the 73 TAS. This paper summarizes the current activities towards the preparation of the third book.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".