MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182728988 · doi:10.14430/arctic4537

Factors Governing the Distribution and Abundance of Arctic Ground Squirrels

2015· article· en· W2182728988 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jeffery R. Werner

Bibliographic record

VenueARCTIC · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland and Wildlife Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrsusVulpesLagopusEcologyPopulationGeographyArctic foxPredationTaigaBorealArcticCanisVoleGround squirrelSnowshoe hareBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extinction is the most extreme future state for any wildlife population. In Canada’s northern montane boreal regions, the disappearance of any small herbivore will have consequences for the way energy flows between trophic levels. Arctic ground squirrels (Urocitellus parryii plesius) were once so plentiful as to be responsible for approximately one-quarter of the energy flow at the herbivore level (Boonstra et al., 2001). However, population dynamics of this species over the past decade serve as a potent example of how northern regions may now be in dramatic flux. The Arctic ground squirrel is the largest ground squirrel in North America and has the most northerly distribution (Fig. 1). It lives throughout the montane boreal, alpine, and tundra regions and hibernates from September to mid-April (Naughton, 2012). In the Yukon, it is an important seasonal food source for many predators, including lynx (Lynx canadensis), coyote (Canis latrans), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), wolf (Canis lupus), black bear (Ursus americanus), grizzly bear (Ursus arctos), wolverine (Gulo gulo), Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), and Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). Arctic ground squirrels are also hunted by Yukon First Nations as a traditional source of food. Population fluctuations of Arctic ground squirrels therefore affect the food supply available to a wide list of predators. For almost three decades (1973 – 99), ground squirrel populations in the boreal forests of the Kluane region (SW Yukon) cycled in a predictable manner (Werner et al., 2015b) in concert with the snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus; Boutin et al., 1995). This 9 – 10 year cycle was stable up until 2000. In that year, populations crashed, and they have not, as yet, recovered. This once important species declined from 17% of the regional herbivore biomass to nearly zero. Most boreal forest populations (~95%) are now extinct, as are a large fraction (~65%) of nearby meadow populations. I am now conducting experiments and surveys designed to clarify the likely causes and consequences of these dramatic changes. The measures described below are intended to address a number of specific research projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCTICSame topicRangeland and Wildlife ManagementFrench-language works237,207