Behavioral feedback regulation of circadian rhythm phase angle in light-dark entrained mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Induced and spontaneous wheel running can alter the phase and period (tau) of circadian rhythms in rodents. The relationship between spontaneous running and the phase angle (psi) of entrainment to 24-h light-dark (LD) cycles was evaluated in C57BL/6j mice. With a wheel freely available, psi was significantly correlated with the absolute (r = 0.32) and relative (r = 0.44) amount of activity during the first 2 h of the activity period. When wheels were locked during the first half of the night in LD and then unlocked in constant dark (DD), mice exhibited a delayed psi and lengthened tau compared with mice that had wheels locked during the second half of the night. In DD, tau correlated negatively with total daily activity. To evaluate if wheel running modulates the phase-resetting actions of LD, phase shifts to light pulses were measured at two time points in DD, when daily activity levels differed by 40%. Phase delays to light were 56% greater when activity levels were lower. However, in a counterbalanced follow-up experiment, phase advances and delays to light pulses were not affected by the availability of wheels, although an effect of time in DD was replicated. Spontaneous activity can regulate psi and tau without altering the response of the pacemaker to light.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".