Promoter analysis of the gene encoding the β-subunit of the rat amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC), found in the apical membrane of Na(+)-absorptive epithelia, is made up of three differentially regulated subunits: alpha, beta, and gamma. We undertook a study of the 5'-end of the gene encoding the beta-ENaC subunit in the rat. 5'-Rapid amplification of cDNA ends and RNase protection assays indicated multiple transcription start sites over a 50-bp region. Sequencing 1.3 kb of the 5'-flanking DNA revealed putative binding sites for PEA3, Sp1, activator protein (AP)-1 and Oct-1 but neither a TATA box nor consensus sites for steroid hormone receptor binding. Transient transfections of reporter constructs driven by beta-ENaC 5'-flanking DNA in the representative epithelial cell lines Madin-Darby canine kidney, MLE-15, and Caco-2 revealed a negative element present between positions -424 and -311 that affected basal transcription rates. Gel shift assays showed protein-DNA binding activity of an AP-1 consensus site in this region; however, mutation of the AP-1 site did not abrogate the repressive activity of the region in transient transfections. Deletion of two clusters of Sp1 consensus binding sites between -1 and -51 bp and between -169 and -211 bp indicated that the proximal cluster was essential to basal promoter activity in transfected cell lines. In a comparison of these data with those in published studies on alpha- and gamma-ENaC promoters, the beta- and gamma-subunit promoters appear to be more similar to each other than to the alpha-promoter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".