MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182895732

Queen's Award for Dianthus specialist

2013· article· en· W2182895732 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Licensingm Arketingd Istribution

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)ManagementGold medalExcellenceInternshipEngineeringLibrary scienceArt historyPolitical scienceHistoryLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

British ornamental horticulture company Whetman Pinks is celebrating after being named the winner of the prestigious Queen’s Award for Enterprise – the UK’s highest accolade for business success. The citation refers to the Company’s ‘Outstanding Contribution to International Trade’. Based in Ashcombe, South Devon, Whetman Pinks was founded in 1936 and employs 32 people from the local area. Whetman breeds and propagates hybrid Dianthus (Pinks) and exports to a worldwide market including mainland Europe, Japan, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. It is the only commercial Dianthus specialist in the world. As a first time winner of the Queen’s Award for Enterprise, the company is single-minded in its pursuit of excellence and customer satisfaction. Sales are achieved via trade shows – mainly abroad, publications and its wholesale catalogue as well as with the invaluable support of overseas intermediaries such as PMA. Managing Director Carolyn Bourne said that receiving the Queen’s Award would contribute greatly towards helping to promote the UK Ornamental Horticulture industry around the world. She added that “the thrill and pride of winning comes as a wonderful boost to morale in these difficult times for the industry. In a year which has included a Gold Medal at Chelsea, a regional Employer of the Year award and Overall Ornamental Grower of the Year Award, the Queen’s Award in her Jubilee year comes as a magnificent finale.” Above all she expressed thanks to all her colleagues at Whetman’s for the hard work without which it would never have been possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlowering Plant Growth and CultivationFrench-language works237,207