NEW REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE SITES IN CANADA: AN OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE AT HISTORIC WASTE SITES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) is Canada’s nuclear regulator (formerly the Atomic Energy Control Board) operating under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act, which was promulgated in May 2000. The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office (LLRWMO) has been Canada’s agency for the management of historic low-level radioactive waste sites since 1982. Operations of the LLRWMO at presently contaminated sites, interim storage sites and future disposal sites, must now consider the new regulatory context. A major change affecting the operations of the LLRWMO is that CNSC licensing decisions are now triggered based on total activity instead of specific activity or concentration as in the past. The paper discusses the impacts of this and other changes in the new act and new regulations on the operation of established facilities and programs of the LLRWMO. Among these are future cleanup activities at known and yet to be encountered sites. This paper will interest stakeholders in Canada and observers of regulatory practices elsewhere. Among the conclusions is the realization that through the immediate phase-in period of the next year or so, cooperation and action involving both regulators and licensees is essential to effect the necessary change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".