Phytosociological study of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (ATBU), Gubi Campus, Bauchi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phytosociological study of Gubi Campus of the Abuba kar Tafawa Balewa University (ATBU) Bauchi was conducted, using the Point Center Quarter method (P CQ). The study area has a total land area of 48 km 2 ; the study area was divided into four (4) sites. And from each site 20 quadrants measuring 100x100m were selected as representatives of the whole study area. Each of th e quadrants was divided into five subunits (20x20m) from the right angles and the center. In each of the subunit s (20x20m), 10 sampling point were randomly establi shed and phytosociological data were recorded. Plant (tree) species composition, density, frequency, coverage a nd importance value indices (I.V.I) were determined. T he community of the study area was established by t he dominant species and designated as Anogeissus-Parkia-Scleroc arya woodland. Two families were found to be leadi ng in terms of species representations, they are Combreta ceae and Mimosaceae. Anogeissus leiocarpus and scel erocarya birea, has the highest numerical strength. Shannon Wiener’s index indicates the vegetation is reasonab ly diverse. Jaccard index showed similarity between site 3 and 4, there was generally dissimilarity between the ot her sites. Vegetation in Gubi Campus was observed to be under threat from anthropogenic activities. There is thus the need for University authority to device measures to cons erve the vegetation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".