MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183068089 · doi:10.2527/2001.791200x

Effects of different patterns of feed restriction and insulin treatment during the luteal phase on reproductive, metabolic, and endocrine parameters in cyclic gilts.

2001· article· en· W2183068089 on OpenAlexaff
Flávio Almeida, J Mao, Susan Novak, John R. Cosgrove, G. R. Foxcroft

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyEstrous cycleOvulationInsulinLuteal phaseEndocrine systemPostprandialHormoneBiologyLeptinTriiodothyronineBlood samplingMedicineObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of the present study were 1) to study potential effects of previous nutritional treatment on developmental competence of early fertilized oocytes in vitro; 2) to study responses to insulin treatment during the period of feed restriction in the late luteal phase which has deleterious effects on subsequent fertility; and 3) to establish the metabolic and endocrine status of gilts during treatment and the subsequent periestrous period. Nineteen trios of littermate gilts were subjected to feed restriction during the first (RH) or second (HR) week of the estrous cycle. A second group of HR gilts received injections of long-acting insulin during their period of feed restriction (HR+I). Intensive sampling was performed in a subgroup of 23 animals on d 15 and 16 of the cycle for analyses of endocrine (gonadotropins and steroid hormones) and metabolic (insulin, IGF-I, leptin, total triiodothyronine [T3], and free T3) variables. Gilts were checked for estrus every 6 h, and time of ovulation was monitored by transcutaneous ultrasonography. Surgeries were performed 12 to 20 h after ovulation, and the early-fertilized oocytes recovered were cultured in vitro under standardized conditions. There was no treatment effect on the developmental competence of fertilized oocytes in vitro; however, ovulation rate was increased in HR+I gilts. No effect of treatment was observed on plasma leptin and IGF-I concentrations on d 15 and 16. However, HR+I gilts had higher (P < 0.05) postprandial insulin and lower (P < 0.05) postprandial total and free T3 on d 15. Plasma concentrations of LH, FSH, and progesterone on d 15 and 16 and plasma estradiol concentrations on d 16 were not affected by previous nutritional or insulin treatment. In the periestrous period, plasma concentrations of LH, FSH, and estradiol were higher (P < 0.05) in RH and HR+I, and the rise in plasma progesterone after the LH surge was lower (P < 0.05), than in HR gilts. No effect of treatment was observed on plasma concentrations of metabolic hormones, except on plasma leptin concentrations, which were higher (P < 0.05) at the time of the LH surge in RH gilts. These results suggest that feed restriction during the late luteal phase may have deleterious effects on ovarian function in the periestrous period, which may be counteracted by insulin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207