Lectotype designations, new synonymies, and new species in the genera Trichillum Harold and Pedaridium Harold (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three new synonymies are proposed in the genera Trichillum and Pedaridium (the second epithet is valid): T. pereirai Martínez, 1959 = T. heydeni Harold, 1868; T. boucomonti Saylor, 1935 = T. hirsutum Boucomont, 1928; and P. brasiliense Ferreira & Galileo, 1993 = P. bidens Balthasar, 1938. One previous synonym (T. elongatum Balthasar, 1939 = P. argentinum Arrow, 1913) is confirmed. Lectotypes are designated for three species names (including one synonym): T. heydeni, P. bidens, and T. elongatum. Species previously misidentified as T. heydeni; T. arrowi Saylor, 1935; and T. depilatum Balthasar, 1942 are described as new, respectively T. tishechkini sp. nov., T. pseudoarrowi sp. nov., and T. cordobense sp. nov. Brief diagnosis and illustrations are given for treated species.Três nova sinonímias são propostas nos gêneros Trichillum e Pedaridium (o segundo epíteto sendo válido): T. pereirai Martínez, 1959 = T. heydeni Harold, 1868; T. boucomonti Saylor, 1935 = T. hirsutum Boucomont, 1928; and P. brasiliense Ferreira & Galileo, 1993 = P. bidens Balthasar, 1938. Uma sinonímia anterior (T. elongatum Balthasar, 1939 = P. argentinum Arrow, 1913) é confirmada. Se designam lectótipos para três espécies (incluindo um sinônimo): T. heydeni, P. Bidens, e T. elongatum. Novas espécies previamente erroneamente identificadas como T. heydeni; T. arrowi Saylor, 1935; e T. depilatum Balthasar, 1942 são descritas, respectivamente T. tishechkini sp. nov., T. pseudoarrowi sp. nov., e T. cordobense sp. nov. Se apresentam diagnoses e ilustrações de cada espécie tratada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".