Effects of hetastarch and mannitol on prolonging survival in stable hypothermia in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In rats, prolonged stable hypothermia ( approximately 24 h at body temperature of 19 degrees C) is characterized by a time-dependent increase in hematocrit, plasma osmolality, and red blood cell fragility and a decrease in plasma volume. These changes impede tissue microcirculation and could limit survival. As a countermeasure, we used plasma volume expanders of both long (hetastarch)- and short-lasting (mannitol) characteristics to improve microcirculation and hopefully hypothermia survival. Infusion of 6% hetastarch at hour 3 in hypothermia significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced survival over saline control (33.5 vs. 23.8 h); a significant delay in the increases of hematocrit and cell fragility was also observed compared with those in saline controls. Treating the animal with 6% hetastarch at hour 20 during hypothermia caused a similar but less-effective improvement in survival. In contrast, treating the rats with 6% mannitol at hour 3 or 20 during hypothermia failed to enhance survival over saline control, although transient improvement in plasma volume was observed. Our results indicate that by using a long-lasting volume expander, which tends to better maintain plasma volume and rheological parameters governing microcirculation than does saline or a short-lasting volume expander, hypothermia survival can be significantly improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".