MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183807139 · doi:10.1201/noe0415444019-c146

Material behaviour associated with tunnelling through the weak rock masses of the Alpine system in Northern Greece

2007· book-chapter· en· W2183807139 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Vlachopoulos, Mark S. Diederichs

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum tunnellingGeologyEarth sciencePaleontologyPhysicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The backdrop for this research paper is the tunnelling that is currently nearing completion in the Epirus and Western Macedonia regions of Northern Greece, as part of the Egnatia Odos Highway construction. Highly deformed and altered sediments and low grade metamorphic rock masses dominate the near surface environment creating a variety of technical challenges for tunnelling. Accurate equivalent rock mass performance predictions for tunnels in these materials (including yield and residual strength as well as flow and dilation considerations) is complicated by geomorphologic peculiarities (mixed face conditions, variable orientation or rock masses and structure) such as flysch materials. In addition, portal stability problems, and geometrical issues such as the effects of simultaneous twin tunnel excavation on radial displacements of each bore are also key considerations. This work involves the use of 2D and 3D research models of tunnel sequencing for numerical simulation of composite material behaviour and sequential tunnel deformation response with a goal to investigating the strength and deformation of heterogeneous rockmasses. A discussion of the geological conditions, material property determination, monitoring data and the model calibration strategy is given. The focus is on the Driskos tunnel, the longest of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTunneling and Rock MechanicsFrench-language works237,207