An in-vivo model to interrogate the transition from acute to chronic inflammation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study describes the modulation of the rodent foreign body giant cell (FBGC) response to subcutaneously implanted, biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/calcium phosphate (PLGA/CaP) composites by application of a thin surface coat of calcium phosphate. Macroporous PLGA/CaP composite scaffolds, with interconnecting macroporosity, were half coated with a 3mm thick layer of CaP by immersion in simulated body fluid. Half-coated scaffolds were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsum of male Wistar rats for 1, 4 and 8 weeks. Specimens were embedded in paraffin and tissue sections evaluated by light microscopy with particular reference to the FBGC response. Histomorphometry revealed that FBGCs were in contact with 6% (+/- 3.5%) of the uncoated half, at 1 week, but no FBGCs were seen on the coated half. By 4 weeks, FBGCs were seen on both the uncoated and coated halves of the scaffolds with 87% (+/-10%) and 36% (+/-4%) FBGC/polymer contact respectively. By 8 weeks these FBGC contact percentages had risen to 97% (+/-0.45%) in the case of the uncoated halves of scaffolds, but decreased to 22% (+/-4%) in the case of the CaP-coated halves. Thus the CaP coating abrogated the FBGC response to the underlying polymer. Such a model may prove useful in providing an experimental system whereby both the mechanisms of biocompatibility and the transition from acute to chronic inflammation could be interrogated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it