MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184043797 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.5325

Management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

2018· review· en· W2184043797 on OpenAlexaffvenue
R. Christopher Doiron, J. Curtis Nickel

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstatitisPelvic painMedicineChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndromeChronic painChronic diseasePhysical therapyUrologyProstateInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

�1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], �2.8 to �0.6), �1.1 (95% CI, �1.8 to �0.3), �1.4 (95% CI, �2.3 to �0.5), and �1.0 (95% CI, �1.8 to �0.2), respectively. Patients receiving -blockers or anti-inflammatory medications had a higher chance of favorable response compared with placebo, with pooled RRs of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.3) and 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2-2.6), respectively. Contour-enhanced funnel plots suggested the presence of publication bias for smaller studies of -blocker therapies. The network meta-analysis suggested benefits of antibiotics in decreasing total symptom scores (�9.8; 95% CI, �15.1 to �4.6), pain scores (�4.4; 95% CI, �7.0 to �1.9), voiding scores (�2.8; 95% CI, �4.1 to �1.6), and quality-of-life scores (�1.9; 95% CI, �3.6 to �0.2) compared with placebo. Combining-blockers and antibiotics yielded the greatest benefits compared with placebo, with corresponding decreases of �13.8 (95% CI, �17.5 to �10.2) for total symptom scores, �5.7 (95% CI, �7.8 to �3.6) for pain scores, �3.7 (95% CI, �5.2 to �2.1) for voiding, and �2.8 (95% CI, �4.7 to �0.9) for quality-of-life scores. Conclusions -Blockers,antibiotics,andcombinationsofthesetherapiesappeartoachieve the greatest improvement in clinical symptom scores compared with placebo. Antiinflammatory therapies have a lesser but measurable benefit on selected outcomes. However, beneficial effects of -blockers may be overestimated because of publication bias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207