MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184218825

The Role of the State in Managing Common Pool Resources: The Search for Solutions to Manage Non-Timber Forest Products in British Columbia, Canada

2009· article· en· W2184218825 on OpenAlex
Sinclair Tedder

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Property rightsGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)BusinessEconomic interventionismResource (disambiguation)Natural resourceForest managementCommon-pool resourceEnvironmental resource managementNatural resource economicsEconomicsPolitical scienceGeographyForestryComputer scienceLawMicroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Institutional and property rights literature on common pool resources (CPRs) describes various conditions under which successful property regimes may evolve. But what happens when this natural evolution does not occur, property regimes dissolve, or competing and detrimental uses have well defined rights that take precedence? The backdrop for this presentation is British Columbia, Canada, where the commercial harvest of non-timber forest products occurs at potentially destructive rates on de facto open access or under-managed public land, amidst a well defined timber tenure system. Appropriators are disorganized and the provincial government struggles to understand if a problem exists, and to identify appropriate policy responses. The research upon which this paper is based seeks to understand why a state should intervene in a CPR market, when a state should intervene, and how a state may intervene and begin to structure the way in which it approaches the management problem? Thus, what is the state's role in managing CPRs? The paper develops an intervention model to assess CPRs under stress and to determine whether or not some form of intervention is necessary. By identifying sources of institutional failure and contextual factors that contribute to the level of potential degradation the model provides a basis to begin to approach the management of a CPR through facilitative, coordinating, or prescriptive approaches. This approach does not start with a particular management paradigm; rather it starts with the CPR social-ecological system and builds the management regime up from the level of the resource and user-community. The commercial harvest of salal in British Columbia is used as a test case. The model indicates commercial salal is at risk and government intervention is warranted."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it