Tolerance of Three Sweet Corn Hybrids to a Postemergence Tankmix of Nicosulfuron plus Bromoxynil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trials were conducted over 2 years at three locations in Ontario to determine the tolerance of three sweet corn hybrids to postemergence application of nicosulfuron (25 and 50 g·ha –1 ), bromoxynil (280 and 560 g·ha –1 ), and nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil (25 + 280 g·ha –1 and 50 + 560 g·ha –1 ). All hybrids showed injury 7 days after treatment (DAT). The crop largely recovered from the injury in most treatments, as indicated by the ratings completed 14 and 28 DAT. However injury from the tankmix of nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil at both rates still appeared to be synergistic at 7, 14, and 28 DAT. Visual injury, height reductions and yield loss in the nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil (50 + 560 g·ha –1 ) treatment were more severe than in the other herbicide treatments. Yield of BSS5362 was significantly decreased in the nicosulfuron (50 g·ha –1 ) and nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil (50 + 560 g·ha –1 ) but was not affected by any other herbicide-hybrid combination. Caution must be exercised when using this tankmix combination, as there is potential to cause significant visual injury, height reductions and yield loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".