MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184283609

Giovanni Capellini and the origin of the

2002· article· en· W2184283609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gian Battista Vai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceState (computer science)HistoryArchaeologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Geological Congress (IGC), originally the International Congress of Geologists, was founded on August 25, 1876, at the 25th Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, held in Buffalo, New York. The founding committee was composed of participants from the USA and Canada, with the addition of two geologists from Sweden and The Netherlands. Why did it take so many years after its establishment for the countries represented in the founding committee to host the IGC, beginning with the 5th IGC, held in Washington D.C. in 1893? The answer may be in documents, which point to the idea of the IGC originating from Giovanni Capellini as a result of his journeys in Europe and North America, especially through discussions with his French and Swiss friends. Capellini was the first titular chair of geology funded by the new-born Italian state in Bologna. European travels reinforced Capellini’s intention to create a great geological museum designed to store types and standards of fossils, rocks, lithic tools, and materials used for geological mapping, mining exploration, land planning, and improving agriculture. His long geological travel through North America in 1863 allowed Capellini to convey to many North American geologists his conviction that there was need for an international forum to reach a wide agreement on stratigraphy, palaeontology and mapping. During his 1863 trip, Capellini became a friend of three future members of the IGC founding committee and familiar with two others through common acquaintances. Perhaps, the Italian-French group of leading figures who first conceived of the IGC asked their North American colleagues to make a proposal from abroad. This same successful procedure of an ‘outside’ request was followed in founding the International Congress of Anthropology and pre-Historical Archaeology in 1865. The idea came from French scientists who confidentially asked Capellini to found the congress and suggested to hold the first session in Neuchâtel in 1866 and the second in Paris in 1867. This then may be the key to understanding why the first four IGCs were held in France, Italy, Germany, and UK before one took place in the USA where the IGC was founded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory of Science and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207