MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2184512934

Discrimination of the endangered Atlantic Whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani Scott, 1987) larvae and juveniles

2012· article· en· W2184512934 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel J. Hasselman, Rodney G. Bradford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEndangered speciesCoregonusFisheryCoregonus clupeaformisZoologyLarvaDorsal finEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>Habitat
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hasselman, D.J. and Bradford, R.G. 2012. Discrimination of the endangered Atlantic Whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani Scott, 1987) larvae and juveniles. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2993: iii + 24 p. Atlantic Whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani) are an endangered species endemic to Nova Scotia, Canada. Several actions identified in the Atlantic Whitefish recovery strategy require accurate identification of the species early life history stages. While criteria exists for the discrimination of adult specimens, no such criteria is available for larvae or juveniles. Using specimens obtained from the captive mating of wild caught adults, and those made available to this study, we conduct discriminant function analyses on phenetic characters, and incorporate speciesspecific pigmentation patterns to develop discrimination criteria for early life history stage Atlantic Whitefish, Lake Whitefish (C. clupeaformis), and Cisco (C. artedii). Quantifiable interspecific differences in the number of pre-anal myomeres, total myomeres, and anal fin ray counts, when combined with dorsal and ventral pigmentation patterns can be used to discriminate larval and juvenile specimens of Atlantic Whitefish, Lake Whitefish, and Cisco. The external characters identified as useful common reference points for the delineation of these three species could be extended to include additional coregonine species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→