MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184603620

Elevation of plasma homocysteine levels associated with acute myocardial infarction.

2000· article· en· W2184603620 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manohara Senaratne, Jo Griffiths, Jayan Nagendran

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsGrey Nuns Community Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionHomocysteineCoronary care unitInternal medicineCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseProspective cohort studyPlasma homocysteinePlasma levelsHospital dischargeRisk factor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on plasma homocystein (Hcy) levels, to determine the optimal time to measure this risk factor for coronary artery disease. DESIGN: A prospective case study. SETTING: The Division of Cardiac Sciences, Grey Nuns Hospital in Edmonton. PATIENTS: Sixty-two patients (40 men, 22 women) admitted to hospital with AMI. INTERVENTION: Measurement of Hcy levels within 48 to 72 hours of admission and at 6 weeks after discharge from the Coronary Care Unit. In a second group of 15 patients, the Hcy levels were measured on hospital days 1 and 3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Comparison of the Hcy levels measured at the time of AMI and after discharge. RESULTS: Mean (and standard error of the mean) Hcy level measured during the AMI (13.6 [0.98] micromol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than at 6 weeks (12.1 [1.01] micromol/L). Based on the 48- to 72-hour and 6-week determinations, 31 and 21 patients, respectively, had abnormal Hcy levels (greater than 12 micromol/L) (p < 0.001). In the separate group of 15 patients, the Hcy level measured on day 3 (9.7 [0.6] micromol/L) was noted to be significantly higher (p < 0.01) than on day 1 (7.7 [0.8] micromol/L). CONCLUSIONS: There is an elevation of Hcy during AMI that may be related to an increase in the acute-phase reactant proteins. Thus, Hcy measurement should be deferred for 6 weeks in order to determine the true baseline level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207