Nutrition Indices in Obese Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Inadequate and Adequate Urea Clearance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test whether better nutrition is associated more with adequate urea clearance than with inadequate urea clearance in obese patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis (CPD). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clearance and nutrition indices in obese CPD patients. Only obese patients were analyzed. Obesity was defined as a ratio of actual weight to desired weight (W/DW) > or = 1.2. The dose of dialysis was considered adequate at weekly Kt/V urea > or = 2.0. Small solute clearances and nutrition indices were compared between patients with weekly Kt/V urea < 2.0 and patients with weekly Kt/V urea > or = 2.0 at the first clearance study. SETTING: Four university-affiliated and two private dialysis units in Canada and the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 270 CPD patients with W/DW > or = 1.2 at the first clearance study. RESULTS: Among the 270 obese CPD patients, 157 (58.1%) were underdialyzed (weekly Kt/V urea 1.66 +/- 0.22) and 113 (41.9%) had adequate dialysis (weekly Kt/V urea 2.51 +/- 0.47) at the first clearance study. Creatinine clearance values also differed between the underdialyzed and adequately dialyzed obese groups (55.6 +/- 15.2 vs 87.6 +/- 29.8 L/1.73 m2 weekly, respectively, p < 0.001). The underdialyzed group contained fewer women (39.5% vs 60.2%, p < 0.001) and more patients with anuria (35.0% vs 8.8%, p < 0.001), and had higher serum urea (20.7 +/- 6.9 vs 18.2 +/- 5.3 mmol/L, p = 0.001) and serum creatinine (974 +/- 283 vs 734 +/- 275 micromol/L, p < 0.001), marginally lower serum albumin (35.8 +/- 5.2 vs 37.2 +/- 6.4 g/L, p = 0.082), lower urea nitrogen excretion (5778 +/- 2290 vs 7085 +/- 2238 mg/24 hr, p < 0.001) and indices derived from urea nitrogen excretion (protein nitrogen appearance and normalized protein nitrogen appearance), and lower creatinine excretion (1034 +/- 349 vs 1217 +/- 432 mg/24 hr, p < 0.001) and indices derived from creatinine excretion (lean body mass normalized to actual or desired weight) than the adequately dialyzed group. CONCLUSION: Nutrition indices derived from urea nitrogen and creatinine excretion are worse in underdialyzed than in adequately dialyzed obese CPD patients. This finding may have clinical importance, despite the mathematical coupling between small solute clearances and excretion rates in cross-sectional studies, because of evidence from other studies that small solute excretion rate in cross-sectional studies is a robust Independent predictor of outcome in CPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".