MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184642465

Exploring the Help-Seeking Attitudes of Graduate Students at an Off-Campus Site Explorer les attitudes des étudiants des cycles supérieurs sollicitant le counseling dans un centre hors-campus

2010· article· fr· W2184642465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John T. McCarthy, Michelle L. Bruno, C.A. Sherman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduate studentsPsychologyHumanitiesPedagogyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the help-seeking attitudes of graduate students enrolled in an offcampus professional centre. The sample consisted of 217 participants enrolled in 10 graduate programs (130 women [60%], 37 men [17%], 50 unspecified [23%]). Analyses (descriptive statistics and t-tests) indicated that women possessed more favourable at titudes toward seeking counselling than men. Furthermore, an overwhelming majority of graduate students would not travel to the main campus to utilize counselling services. Many participants identified potential obstacles, including lack of time, affordability, and lack of insurance coverage, as important obstacles to help-seeking. Several factors were also found to be significant predictors of help-seeking attitudes. University counselling centre professionals are encouraged to be available and sensitive to the counselling needs of off-campus graduate students. resume Cette etude a examine les attitudes des etudiants des cycles superieurs cherchant le counseling inscrits a un centre professionnel hors-campus. L’echantillon etait compose de 217 participants inscrits a 10 programmes d’etudes superieures (130 femmes [60 %], 37 hommes [17 %], 50 non specifie [23 %]). Les analyses (statistique descriptive et t-tests) ont indique que les femmes avaient une attitude plus ouverte a la demande d’aide que les hommes. En outre, une majorite ecrasante d’etudiants des cycles superieurs ne se deplacerait pas au campus principal pour utiliser les services de counseling. Beaucoup de participants ont identifie des facteurs potentiels, incluant le manque de temps, le cout, et le manque de couverture assurance, comme obstacles importants a chercher le counseling. Plusieurs facteurs sont egalement averes predicteurs significatifs des attitudes envers la recherche du counseling. Les professionnels aux centres de counseling dans les universites sont encourages a etre disponibles et sensibles aux besoins de counseling des etudiants des cycles superieurs hors-campus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207