Regulation of contraction and relaxation by membrane potential in cardiac ventricular myocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Control of contraction and relaxation by membrane potential was investigated in voltage-clamped guinea pig ventricular myocytes at 37 degrees C. Depolarization initiated phasic contractions, followed by sustained contractions that relaxed with repolarization. Corresponding Ca(2+) transients were observed with fura 2. Sustained responses were ryanodine sensitive and exhibited sigmoidal activation and deactivation relations, with half-maximal voltages near -46 mV, which is characteristic of the voltage-sensitive release mechanism (VSRM) for sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+). Inactivation was not detected. Sustained responses were insensitive to inactivation or block of L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca-L)). The voltage dependence of sustained responses was not affected by changes in intracellular or extracellular Na(+) concentration. Furthermore, sustained responses were not inhibited by 2 mM Ni(2+). Thus it is improbable that I(Ca-L) or Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange generated these sustained responses. However, rapid application of 200 microM tetracaine, which blocks the VSRM, strongly inhibited sustained contractions. Our study indicates that the VSRM includes both a phasic inactivating and a sustained noninactivating component. The sustained component contributes both to initiation and relaxation of contraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".