MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184853200 · doi:10.4203/ccp.93.264

Numerical Analysis of Complex Systems Evolution with Phase Transformations at Different Spatial Scales

2010· article· en· W2184853200 on OpenAlexaff
Roderick Melnik, R. Dhote, Jean W. Zu, Olena Tsviliuk, L.X. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil-comp proceedings · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanowireStatistical physicsDimension (graph theory)Nanoscopic scaleBasis (linear algebra)RangingField (mathematics)Phase (matter)Length scaleMaterials sciencePhase field modelsThermalPartial differential equationShape-memory alloyPhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisNanotechnologyMechanicsGeometryThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper shows the existence of a critical dimension for finite length nanowires exhibiting shape memory effects. We give a brief survey of phase transformations, their classifications, and provide the basis of mathematical models for the phenomena involving such transformations, focusing on shape memory effects at the nanoscale. Main results are given for the dynamic of square-to-rectangular transformations modelled on the basis of the modified Ginzburg-Landau theory. The results were obtained by solving a fully coupled system of partial differential equations, accounting for the thermal field, a feature typically neglected in recent publications on the subject when microstructures of nanowires were modelled with phase-field approximations. Representative examples are shown for nanowires of length 2000nm and widths ranging from 200nm to 50nm. The observed microstructure patterns are different from the bulk situation due to the fact that interfacial energy becomes comparable at the nanoscale with the bulk energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil-comp proceedingsSame topicSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaFrench-language works237,207