Inadequate heart rate control is associated with worse quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The RYTHMOS study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Significant evidence shows that elevated heart rate (HR) is an independent risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and influences their prognosis. In addition, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have more frequent episodes of angina and their compliance with heart rate agents, such as beta blockers, is poor. The purpose of the multicenter observational RYTHMOS study was to evaluate the role of heart rate management in the prognosis and quality of life in patients with CAD and COPD. METHODS: Baseline data from 280 patients, enrolled in 22 hospitals representing all types of hospital and all geographical areas of the country, were analyzed. All patients had either a prior myocardial infarction or angiographically documented CAD, and COPD verified either after spirometry or from a clinical evaluation by pulmonologists. RESULTS: The mean age of the enrolled patients was 71.8 ± 9.3 years, 76% were males, mean body mass index was 28.6 ± 7.9 kg/m2, 76.3% had hypertension, 31% had diabetes mellitus, and 53.5% of them suffered from heart failure. About 31% of the patients had an angina episode the week before the enrollment and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CSS) classification was class I, II, III and IV in 55%, 30%, 14% and 1%, respectively. The mean resting HR was 72.5 bpm; 51% of the patients had resting HR>70 bpm and 22% of them had HR80 bpm. Only 52.8% of the study patients were receiving beta-blockade (BB) therapy; they were more likely to have resting HR70 bpm (57.4% vs. 42.7%, p<0.001). 16.4% of the patients were receiving ivabradine and they had a higher initial HR compared to the others (78.5 vs. 71.3, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes mellitus was independently associated with HR>70 bpm. Patients with resting HR>70 bpm had significantly more frequent angina episodes (p<0.001), were less satisfied with treatment (p<0.001), and had a lower quality of life (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The baseline data of this study showed that patients with CAD and COPD present inadequate HR control and frequent angina episodes. Apart from the special characteristics of these patients related to COPD management, underuse of BB therapy largely contributes to the inadequate control of HR. Patients with HR>70 bpm had significantly worse quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".