Colonization and immune responses in mice to Helicobacter pylori expressing different Lewis antigens.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A mouse model was established to compare colonization by the H. pylori Sydney strain SS1 with several clinical isolates expressing different Lewis antigens on their surface. In addition, both humoral and cell mediated immune responses were determined for different H. pylori strains. METHODS: Mice were inoculated intragastrically separately with the Sydney strain as well as with five clinical isolates of H. pylori expressing different Lewis (Le) antigen phenotypes. Colonization of the mouse stomach by the bacteria was monitored from two to fourteen weeks post inoculation by four independent methods namely, urease, PCR (using CagA primers), bacterial culture and histology. Antibody titers and cellular immune responses were monitored by ELISA and antigen stimulation test respectively. RESULTS: Different degrees of colonization were observed in C57, CD1 and Balb/c mice inoculated with H. pylori strain SS1 (Le(x), Le(y)) and clinical isolates UA948 (Le(a), Le(x)), UA861 (alpha-glucosyl polyLacNAc), UA1258 (Le(y)), UA802 (Le(y)) and UA1264 (no Le antigen) starting from week two post inoculation. All three mice strains mounted high immune responses against different H. pylori antigens. Treatment of mice with vancomycin prior to inoculation has no effect either on colonization of the stomach or the immune response of the mice. Histological evaluation established colonization after 10 weeks post inoculation but not gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: Stomach of mice can be colonized consistently, with H. pylori strain SS1, and colonization was also achieved with all clinical isolates that were not mouse adapted. These strains could be detected more consistently by PCR in the early stages, then by culture only after 8 - 10 weeks. In our study, Lewis(x) expressing bacterial strain (UA948) failed to colonize Balb/c mice, whereas the Le(y) expressing strain (UA1258) did not colonize C57/BL6 mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".