The Effect of Small Solute Clearances on Survival of Anuric Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Primarily, to determine whether peritoneal small solute clearance is related to patient and technique survival among anuric peritoneal dialysis [continuous ambulatory (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)] patients. A secondary goal was to describe the ability to attain Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) targets among anuric patients on peritoneal dialysis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study via chart reviews. SETTING: Peritoneal Dialysis Unit of Toronto Hospital (Western Division). PATIENTS: The study included 122 CAPD and APD patients between January 1992 and September 1997, with 24-hour urine volume less than 100 mL, or renal creatinine clearance (CCr) less than 1 mL/minute. Adequacy data were available for 115 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and technique failure (TF). Regression analysis was used to estimate the mortality and TF rate ratios (RR) for peritoneal Kt/V urea (pKt/V) and pCCr, adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, months of follow-up prior to anuria, albumin, transport status, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. RESULTS: Fifty seven per cent (51/89) of patients on CAPD and 81% (21/26) on APD had a weekly pKt/V > or = 2 and > or = 2.2, respectively (DOQI targets); whereas only 35% on CAPD (31/89) and 35% (9/26) on APD had a weekly pCCr > or = 60 U1.73 m2 and 66 L/1.73 m2, respectively. Median follow-up times among patients were 16.5 and 19.5 months pre- and postanuria, respectively. Patients with pKt/V > or = 1.85 experienced a strong decrease in patient mortality (RR = 0.54, p= 0.10); the effect was less pronounced for pCCr > or = 50 L/1.73 m2 (RR = 0.63, p = 0.25). No relationship was observed between pKt/V or pCCr and TF. CONCLUSION: Mortality was noticeably less frequent among patients with a pKt/V > or = 1.85 compared with those with a Kt/W < 1.85 (p = 0.10). Given the magnitude of the association, the failure to observe statistical significance relates to the size of the patient cohort. Our results imply that it is, in fact, possible to achieve DOQI targets among anuric patients on peritoneal dialysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".