Effect of acute adrenalectomy on sympathetic responses to peripheral lipopolysaccharide or central PGE<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of plasma corticosterone levels on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) response to intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or intracerebroventricular injections of PG was studied in anesthetized (urethan-chloralose) male Sprague-Dawley rats. For this, electrophysiological recordings of splenic and renal nerves were completed in control or adrenalectomized (ADX) rats. LPS (10 microgram iv) similarly increased splenic and renal nerve activity in control rats with a shorter onset latency for the splenic nerve. Acute ADX enhanced the response of both nerves to LPS (P < 0.005) and reduced the onset latency of the renal nerve (P < 0.05). PGE(2) (2 microgram icv) rapidly increased the activity of both nerves but preferentially (magnitude and onset latency) stimulated the renal nerve (P < 0.05). The magnitude of the splenic nerve response to PGE(2) was unaffected by ADX. Unexpectedly, PGE(2) was less effective at stimulating renal nerve activity in ADX animals relative to intact controls (P < 0.05). Pretreatment of ADX rats with a CRF antagonist ([D-Phe(12), Nle(21,38), Calpha-MeLeu(37)]CRF-(12-41)) reversed this effect such that the renal nerve responded to central PGE(2) to a greater extent than the splenic nerve (P < 0.05), as was the case in non-ADX rats. These data indicate that enhanced sensitivity of central sympathetic pathways does not account for the enhanced SNS responses to LPS in ADX rats. Also, a CRF-related process appears to diminish renal sympathetic outflow in ADX rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".