Bibliographic record
Abstract
This supplement contains the proceedings of the Third Update on Psoriatic Disease, a sequel to the Second Update in 2012, also published in The Journal 1. The present conference was held at the Oriente Hotel, Naples, Italy, May 22–23, 2014, within the Centro Storico, the historical heart of Naples, and close to the Via Toledo and its now mosaically famous Metro station. Once again, delegates were able to enjoy international cross-fertilization in the field of psoriatic disease against the backdrop of the ancient university city, with the University Federico II celebrating its 790th anniversary. As with the previous meeting, care was taken by Professor Raffaele Scarpa and his organizing team to preserve the now internationally acknowledged term “psoriatic disease” (PsD), as opposed to psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for the title of the conference. Thus, the focus on more recent views on related psoriatic disorders as a multisystem, interrelated cluster, rather than a more specifically arthritis-expressed condition, was retained and indeed expanded by the work presented here. Care was also taken to continue scope for critically reviewing the place of PsD within the spondyloarthropathy (SpA) complex. And once again, as in previous years, the non-rheumatoid nature of PsD was further endorsed, and to a new level, as remains the case for other sister conditions within the SpA family complex. The Update conference started with a morning session devoted to presentations by rheumatology trainees. Seven postgraduates, largely from academic centers in Italy, delivered a series of impressive studies, each at least satisfying internationally accepted criteria for successful performance [e.g., GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) trainee assessments]. Following their presentation they performed equally well during the period set aside for questions and comments. And whether their focus was on clinical, etiopathogenetic, or therapeutic studies, their full attention …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".