Interspecific interactions between mountain and black-capped chickadees within a contact zone.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hybridization occurs at least occasionally in more than 9% of bird species. Within the Paridae (chickadees and titmice), hybridization is documented both among the Old World species and North American species. Europe has a larger number of sympatric tit species than does North America, but appears to have less hybridization. These overlapping species may have developed isolating mechanisms to decrease hybridization and as a result maintain distinct species. In North America, little research has focused on potential hybridization between the two closely related species that occasionally occur in sympatry and anecdotal evidence suggests they occasionally hybridize: black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain (P. gambelli) chickadees. My PhD research focuses on the interspecific relationships and potential hybridization between black-capped chickadees and mountain chickadees at the John Prince Research Forest (JPRF) in northern British Columbia. I focused my work on behavioural mechanisms that may reinforce species isolation and genetic analysis to determine the amount of intermixing that is occurring between species. Through nuclear and mitochondrial DNA analyses, I found evidence of hybridization. All but one of these hybrids were phenotypically mountain chickadees that had black-capped DNA in their genome. Further, all hybrids that were found amongst nestlings occurred in mountain chickadee nests showing genetic patterns indicating extra-pair copulations between female mountain chickadees and males black-capped chickadees. As dominance status is known to affect mate choice in black-capped chickadees, interspecific social hierarchies have the potential to interfere with interspecific interactions and create the potential for hybridization. My field observations and aviary experiments showed that black-capped chickadees are dominant over mountain chickadees in almost all circumstances. In aviary trails comparing responsiveness of either species to flock-rallying chick-a-dee calls, I found that mountain chick
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".