MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Drying Kinetics and Quality Characteristics of Microwave-Vacuum Dried Saskatoon Berries

2007· article· en· W2185813966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoistureWater contentMicrowaveBerryDried fruitMaterials scienceVacuum dryingHorticultureEnvironmental scienceChemistryFood scienceMeteorologyComposite materialPhysicsFreeze-dryingBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saskatoon berry (Amelanchier alnifolia) is a high moisture content fruit crop, harvested at 75-80% moisture content (w.b.) and dried to lower moisture contents for a safe, extended shelf-life and for further usage in food applications. Saskatoon berries were dried from an initial moisture content of 75.5% to around 25% (w.b.) using microwave-vacuum drying. In this study, saskatoon berries were dried at different microwave power levels P10 (745 W), P7 (514 W) and P5 (374 W) and vacuum pressure levels V20 (67.0 kPa) and V10 (33.5 kPa). The vacuum pressure levels did not greatly influence the drying time of the saskatoon berries compared to the microwave power levels. Increasing the microwave power level produced faster drying times for the samples. After 12 min of drying at power level P10, the moisture contents of the samples at vacuum pressures of 33.5 and 67.0 kPa were 29.74 and 31.24%, respectively. However after drying for 12 min at vacuum pressure of 33.5 kPa, the moisture contents at power levels P10, P7 and P5 were 29.74, 51.41 and 61.95%, respectively. Polynomial and exponential models were fitted to the drying data. The exponential model provided a better fit for the drying data at the lower vacuum pressure, with higher R2 and lower SE compared to the polynomial model. On the other hand, the polynomial model provided a better fit for the drying data at the higher vacuum pressure. The vacuum pressure and the microwave power levels did not significantly change the yellowness of the samples at indicated by the deltab values. However microwave-vacuum drying produced significant color changes in the L (white = 100 to black = 0) and a (green = -a to red = +a) values as indicated by deltaL and deltaa. Total color difference was dependent on microwave power and vacuum pressure levels. Water activity of the samples after drying ranged from 0.61 to 0.75 for moisture content range of 15.68 to 29.03%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it