MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2186016024

Horse as Healer: An Examination of Equine Assisted Learning in the Healing of First Nations Youth from Solvent

2008· article· en· W2186016024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Colleen Anne Dell, Darlene Chalmers, Debra Dell, Ernie Sauve, Tamara MacKinnon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)SociologyDanceMedia studiesPsychologyGender studiesVisual artsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Contributions: This article is a collaborative community-based effort of the identified authors, with Ernie Sauve representing Elders Herb, Gladys, and John (a pseudonym), staff and members of the Board of Directors of the White Buffalo Youth Inhalant Treatment Centre, and Tamara MacKinnon representing the staff of the Cartier Equine Learning Centre. Acknowledgement: Two of the authors of this article, Darlene and Colleen, were driving from Saskatoon to Sturgeon Lake First Nation to meet with two of the Elders who are trusted with providing spiritual and cultural guidance at the White Buffalo Youth Inhalant Treatment Centre. As they passed a roadside cross (referred to by Darlene as a shrine) to mark the passing of an individual(s) through a motor vehicle accident, they began a discussion that observed how these “shrines” would not exist to the extent they do if there were no vehicles, and, in place, horses were once again the primary mode of transportation. When their morning meeting with the Elders was coming to a close, a final thought was shared by one of the Elders, Herb. He said that the iron horse (i.e., automobile) has contributed its share to the illness (e.g., materialism) that plagues society today. Another of the Elders, Gladys, reflected that all is interconnected in life, and everything (e.g., seasons) comes full circle. In many ways, this article represents a piece of the circle of life for each of the authors. We are happy to be able to share this with the reader, and are grateful for what we have learned in the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→