MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186196679

VENUS WINDS WITH GROUND-BASED DOPPLER VELOCIMETRY AND COMPARISON WITH COORDINATED CLOUD TRACKING METHOD WINDS

2013· article· en· W2186196679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pedro Machado, Thomas Widemann, D. Luz, Javier Peralta

Bibliographic record

VenueLunar and Planetary Science Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenusOrbiterDoppler effectPhysicsGeologyAtmosphere of VenusAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyAstronomyAstrobiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A complete characterization of the venusian superrotation is crucial for understanding its driving mechanisms. In the lower mesosphere (6585 km), visible observations of Doppler shifts in solar Fraunhofer lines have provided the only Doppler wind measurements near the cloud tops in recent years (Widemann et al., 2007, 2008, Machado et al., 2012). The region is important as it constrains the global mesospheric circulation in which zonal winds generally decrease with height while thermospheric subsolar–antisolar (SS-AS) winds increase (Bougher et al., 1997; Lellouch et al., 1997). A renewed interest in measuring Venus’ winds at cloud top level from the ground has emerged in the course of the Venus Express mission. In orbit since 2006, Venus Express characterizes the atmospheric circulation at 70 km through cloud tracking with combined VIRTIS-M and VMC observations. We will present wind results based on observations from 2009 and 2011 obtained with the 3.60 m Canada-France-Hawaii telescope (CFHT) and the Visible Spectrograph ESPaDOnS. We measure the winds using Doppler shifted solar lines and compare with our measurements with VLT/UVES (Machado et al., 2012) and with previous measurements with Venus Express, and Galileo. For the 2011 observations we will present also the results from the synchronized coordinated observations made by the VMC and VIRTIS cameras from the orbiter Venus Express. Since the Venus Express spacecraft operations started in 2006, a continuous effort has been made to coordinate its operations with observations from the ground using various techniques and spectral domains (Lellouch and Witasse, 2008). Both ground-based and Venus Express measurements show considerable day-to-day variability which needs to be carefully assessed. ESPaDOnS and the sequential technique of visible Doppler velocimetry have proven a reliable way to constrain wind gradients in the lower mesosphere and global wind circulation models. Our main purpose is to provide direct wind measurements in the northern and southern hemispheres from visible Fraunhofer lines scattered at Venus’ cloud tops. This will also contribute for cross validation of the cloud tracking method used in many orbiter-based measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLunar and Planetary Science ConferenceSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207