MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186204325 · doi:10.1080/02724634.2015.1031342

A new species of<i>Armigatus</i>(Clupeomorpha, Ellimmichthyiformes) from the Late Cretaceous of Morocco, and its phylogenetic relationships

2015· article· en· W2186204325 on OpenAlexafffund
Oksana Vernygora, Alison M. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCretaceousGenusCenomanianPaleontologyBiologyZoologyPaleoecologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A new species of the genus Armigatus is described from the Cenomanian/early Turonian Akrabou Formation of Morocco. Similar to other ellimmichthyiforms, Armigatus oligodentatus, sp. nov., has parietals in contact with each other along the midline, has a beryciform foramen in the anterior ceratohyal, and lacks the recessus lateralis. The new species is placed in the genus Armigatus based on the incomplete predorsal series of heart-shaped scutes with rounded and smooth posterior border. However, this new species differs from the other known members of the genus in the lack of teeth on the parasphenoid and endopterygoid bones. This is the first report of a species of Armigatus from southeastern Morocco; previously, the genus was known only from the Late Cretaceous deposits of the eastern part of the Tethys. Therefore, Armigatus oligodentatus sp. nov. extends the distribution of the genus across the Tethys Sea and provides valuable information about the evolutionary history and paleoecology of the Ellimmichthyiformes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vertebrate PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207