MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186331194 · doi:10.82308/39350

Subspace-based blind channel estimation : generalization, performance analysis and adaptive implementation

2003· dissertation· en· W2186331194 on OpenAlexafffund
Wei Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersConcordia UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsEstimatorSubspace topologyAlgorithmFadingChannel (broadcasting)Robustness (evolution)Computer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationStatisticsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we present a systematic study of the subspace-based blind channel estimation method. We first formulate a general signal model of multiple simultaneous signals transmitted through vector channels, which can be applied to a multitude of modern digital communication systems. Based on this model, we then propose a generalized subspace-based channel estimator by minimizing a novel cost function, which incorporates the set of kernel matrices of the signals sharing the target channel via a weighted sum of projection errors. We investigate the asymptotic performance1 of the proposed estimator, i.e. bias, covariance, mean square error (MSE) and Cramer-Rao bound, for large numbers of independent observations. We show that the performance of the estimator can be optimized by increasing the number of kernel matrices and by using a special set of weights in the cost function. We also propose a novel adaptive implementation of the generalized subspace channel estimator. The low-complexity and numerical robustness of this adaptive implementation make it suitable for online estimation of time1-varying channels over long observation periods. Finally, we consider the application of the proposed estimator to a down-link CDMA system operating in frequency selective fading channel with negligible ISI. The results of the computer simulations fully support our analytical developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207