Two Phase Flow Downstream of a Multipoint Lean Direct Injection Low NOx Nozzle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work examines the flow downstream of a Parker Hannifin low NOx LDI nozzle. The nozzle is a square matrix of 3 × 3 airblast simplex fuel ports. The air pressure drop was set to 5%, for a Reynolds number of 40,000. Liquid injection pressure was 2.28kPa. The nozzle is tested at atmospheric conditions without combustion. The objective of this work is twofold: first characterize the spray and the turbulent flow fields; and second examine the effect of the interaction between jets on turbulence and spray profiles. Jet-jet lateral impingement starts within ∼ 1–2 nozzle diameters downstream. The comparison of a single jet and the 3 × 3 matrix spray profiles shows some degree of coalescence due to the interaction between jets. Despite this, the Sauter mean diameter of the resulting spray field is in the 25–35 μm range. In the first few air swirl cup diameters downstream of the nozzle exit plane (down to z/D = 3), the droplets are still accelerating to the air velocity and turbulence is anisotropic. No–slip and turbulence isotropy assumption are accurate only well downstream of the exit plane (z/D = 7.5).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".