MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Caffeine stores and dopamine differentially require Ca<sup>2+</sup>channels in goldfish somatotropes

2001· article· en· W2186463538 on OpenAlexaff
Calvin J.H. Wong, James D. Johnson, Warren K. Yunker, John P. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRyanodine receptorCaffeineDopamineIntracellularEndocrinologySomatotropic cellInternal medicineChemistryStimulationBiologyHormonePituitary glandBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion by intracellular Ca(2+) stores was studied in dissociated goldfish somatotropes. We characterized a caffeine-activated intracellular store that had been shown to mediate GH release in response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone. The peak response of caffeine stimulation was reduced by approximately 28% by 100 microM ryanodine in a use-dependent manner suggesting that the first 10 min of GH release is partially mediated by a caffeine-activated ryanodine receptor. The temporal sensitivities of caffeine- and dopamine-evoked GH release to blockade of Cd(2+)-sensitive Ca(2+) channels were compared. We demonstrated that the initial phase of dopamine-evoked release was dependent on Ca(2+) channels, whereas the initial phase of caffeine-evoked release was sensitive only to pretreatment blockade. This would suggest that the maintenance of one class of caffeine-activated intracellular stores requires entry of Ca(2+) through Cd(2+)-sensitive Ca(2+) channels. This differential temporal requirement for Ca(2+) channels in Ca(2+) signaling may be a mechanism to segregate intracellular signaling pathways of multiple neuroendocrine regulators in the teleost pituitary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207