MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2186695432

Durability and prevalence of aortic regurgitation nine years after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV stentless bioprosthesis.

2004· article· en· W2186695432 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David S. Bach, Bernard S. Goldman, Edward D. Verrier, Michael R. Petracek, Jeremy Wood, Scott Goldman, Tirone E. David

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRegurgitation (circulation)CardiologyAortic valve replacementAortic valveHemodynamicsInternal medicineAortic rootSurgeryAortaStenosis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Stentless aortic bioprostheses have excellent hemodynamics. Previous investigations of the Toronto SPV valve described a correlation between the occurrence of significant aortic regurgitation (AR) and dilation of the sinotubular junction. The study aim was to determine the long-term durability and determinants of AR at nine years in a large, multicenter study of the Toronto SPV valve. METHODS: The study included 447 patients from six centers. Clinical outcomes and echocardiographic data (gradients, effective orifice area index (EOA-I), left ventricular mass, aortic root dimensions, and presence and severity of AR) were collected prospectively. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic variables for impact on the occurrence of AR. RESULTS: Total follow up was 2,660 patient-years (mean 6.0 +/- 2.5 years; range: 0 to 11.1 years). Mean gradient and EOA-I remained unchanged through nine years. There were 17 cases of structural deterioration, of which 15 underwent explantation. The mechanism of failure was predominantly leaflet tear in the setting of sinotubular dilation. Freedom from explant for structural failure was 90.1% at nine years (100% for patients aged > or = 65 years). Freedom from hemodynamically significant AR was 96.9% at five years and 82.5% at nine years. Determinants of AR were longer duration of follow up, larger valve size, and increase in the ratio of sinotubular junction to the size of valve implanted. CONCLUSION: At nine years after implantation of the Toronto SPV valve, hemodynamics remained excellent. There was good freedom from structural deterioration through nine years, and structural failure occurred due to aortic root dilation and leaflet tear, without significant valve calcification. AR tends to occur with longer follow up, larger valve sizes, and dilation of the sinotubular junction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→