Effect of kaolin on the striped cucumber beetle («Acalymma vittatum») and cucumber growth and development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La chrysomèle rayée du concombre (CRC) est le principal insecte ravageur des cucurbitacées. L'efficacité du kaolin pour contrôler la CRC (Acalymma vittatum) a été testée dans une culture de concombres. Un essai en champ de deux ans a comparé le kaolin (Surround WP) à un insecticide (carbaryl; Sevin XLR) et un témoin non traité. En 2005, la moyenne saisonnière de CRC était inférieure dans le kaolin. Le flétrissement bactérien (Erwinia tracheiphila) était plus abondant dans le témoin et le kaolin avait des rendements vendables significativement supérieurs aux autres traitements. En 2006, la moyenne de CRC dans le kaolin était comparable aux autres traitements. Le rendement vendable était significativement supérieur dans les parcelles traitées à l'insecticide. Une ou plusieurs applications de kaolin ont eu des effets négatifs sur les échanges gazeux de la feuille à court terme mais des effets négligeables sur la croissance des plants en serre. Lors de l'étude du comportement, le kaolin a réduit la présence des CRC et les dommages sur le feuillage. Le kaolin montre un bon potentiel comme alternative aux insecticides pour protéger les jeunes plants de cucurbitacées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".