MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186779277 · doi:10.82308/10982

Fate and transport of herbicides used in growing transgenic canola in Quebec soils

2013· dissertation· en· W2186779277 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Harvinder Singh Syan

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
KeywordsCanolaSoil waterAgronomyEnvironmental scienceBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canola is the second most important oilseed crop after soybean. More than 90% of the canola crop grown in the world is transgenic. Before this crop is grown more extensively in Quebec, there is a need to assess environmental risks associated with genetically engineered canola, mainly Roundup Ready (glyphosate- resistant) and Liberty Link (glufosinate-resistant) varieties. We have conducted a field study to compare and contrast the fate and transport of glyphosate and glufosinate herbicides in soil (used in transgenic canola production), with trifluralin, a herbicide commonly used with non-transgenic (conventional) canola cultivars. Yield data were also collected in each test plot. Three treatments were assigned (type of transgenic canola, variety, and plant stage at which herbicide application was made), in quadruplicate, in a completely randomized block design set up at two sites: Emile A. Lods Agronomy Research Centre in the Macdonald Campus of McGill University and the Normandin site of Agriculture and Agri food Canada. Soil samples were collected from two depths, 0-0.15 m and 0.15-0.30 m, at different times (1, 7 and 20 days) after herbicide application, during the growing season. Non-significant yield differences were observed between herbicide-resistant and conventional canola grown in Quebec. Glufosinate was found to be the least persistent herbicide (half-life = 7 days), while trifluralin was found to have the longest persistence in the soil (half-life = 54 days). The overall order of persistence was Trifluralin > Glyphosate > Glufosinate. Negligible leaching was observed in case of glyphosate and glufosinate to a depth of 0.30 m. Since glyphosate was found to be highly adsorbed on to the topsoil at the Lods site, herbicide concentrations were recalculated for the top 2 mm of soil, as per published literature, and they were very high, thus heightening concerns for polluted surface runoff. Trifluralin was found at the lower depth (0.15-0.30 cm) at 7 and 20 days after herbicide application, with higher (relative to each herbicide's level in the soil one day after application) residual concentrations than herbicides used in herbicide resistant (HR) canola.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207