MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186876112

LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY AND STRUCTURE OF THE HUMBER ARM ALLOCHTHON IN THE TYPE AREA, BAY OF ISLANDS, NEWFOUNDLAND

2000· article· en· W2186876112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nova Scotia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAllochthonOutcropPaleontologyBeddingClastic rockFold (higher-order function)SLATESSedimentary rockSillGeomorphologyGeochemistryNappe
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The type area of the Humber Arm Allochthon contains continental margin sedimentary units of the Humber Arm Supergroup. Clastic units of the Blow Me Down Brook, Summerside, and Irishtown formations are assigned to the Curling Group. Overlying shale and carbonate sediments of the Cooks Brook and Middle Arm Point formations comprise the Northern Head group. At the top of the succession, the Eagle Island formation records the early stages of Appalachian tectonism. Early (D1) structures in the allochthon include a pervasive, generally bed-parallel foliation or fissility, and abundant boudinage structures generated by brittle fracturing. F1 folds display a variety of relationships with the S1 foliation. In more highly deformed units, bedding cannot be traced through outcrops, and the S1 foliation has a scaly, anastomosing character. Disruption of bedding is measured by a disruption index, on a scale of 1 to 5. Melange is characterized by the mixing of rocks from different formations, in addition to intense disruption of stratification. D1 structures are overprinted by S2 cleavage that crenulates the S1 cleavage in the west, but which becomes generally penetrative in the east. Upright F2 folds are widespread. The S3 and S4 crenulation cleavages are only locally developed. Map scale F3 folding is responsible for distortion of F2 hinges producing domes and basins in the outcrop pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207