In search of culture-bound employee-corporation ties in an MNC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose – The paper discusses the management of corporate identity in a multinational company. The case company faces challenges in its global operations on account of the different cultures. Specifically, the aim is to identify the culturally significant attributes that tie employees to corporations. Employee interviews give an internal perspective on corporate-identity management with regard to two research questions. First, on the individual level what factors tie employees to corporations? Second, what are the cultural characteristics influencing the employee-corporation relationship that MNCs need to consider in managing their corporate identity? Design/methodology – An inductive, qualitative research approach was taken involving one multinational case company. In all, 232 semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with employees representing various organizational levels and departments, in four continents and ten countries: Chile, Mexico, Peru, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, France, Germany, the USA and Canada. Findings –The researchers discovered two regionally distinctive categories of ties linking employees with corporations. It is proposed that employees bond with the company through experiencing “the corporation as an extension of the family” or seeing “the corporation as a means to personal development”. Value – The formulation of useful theories requires a better understanding of cultural characteristics and their relatedness to corporate-identity management on a global scale. The contribution of this work to the theoretical development of these research fields lies in the width
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".